03 August 2006

Rant: Waking Up the Left


I thought it was interesting that during the interview with Ned Lamont when Colbert mentions friends of Israel (if I remember correctly) that Lamont follows a party line and remarks that Israel has a right to defend itself.

I like Lamont but find the Democrats and much of the left's uncritical and zealous support of Israel too much. While I am frustated with Hezbollah's provocation, I feel that Hezbollah's creation is in large part due to Israeli actions in the past.

That frustration with the favoritism for Israel in Middle East only fuels the very things that Israel and the United State hope to qwell. Especially when so many innocent people, in what this administration once touted as bastion for democracy during the Cedar Revolution, are killed or displaced. Why don't more thinking people on the Left realize that this is very dangerous, very sad, very wrong path we are taking.

Lipi sends along this article expressing the same frustrations. If you love peace, if you are a humanist, if you truly believe in progressive ideals then you cannot stand back and watch this happen. By mere inaction you become an accomplice.

The frustration that I have heard from many Arabs (we seem to forget that there are significant populations of Christian Arabs in Lebanon) and Muslims is often summarized in one word: justice. Injustice breeds so many ills. If we truly want change and peace it cannot be done through violence especially when one side in the conflict is so favored. Why is that such a hard lesson for people to learn? With growing sentiment against the war in Iraq why can't people make the conceptual shift to understand the same ideas about the failure of force as a measure to promote change applies to Lebanon?

I think the whole course of events so far does not bode well for the US or Israel. It is only when this mess is too far along and, as Lipi often tells me, we are paying $10 for a gallon of gas will most Americans wake up.

I worry a lot about it all when I try to sleep at night. At the risk of trodding on Dennis' territory I have to say that the recent events have clarified something for me and that is that we are all interconnected. We are really one. I don't want to be hokey but it seems that those in charge have the inability to see the consequences of their thinking and their actions. Utopia or oblivion? Start thinking about love not violence as an answer. Hokey, perhaps, but very powerful. Think love.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Greg,

Thanks for sharing the article by Ruani Seneviratne Freeman, I hadn't seen it yet.

As you know, I agree that it really is a choice between life and oblivion. It's terrifying finding ourselves in a situation where we are having to make such a principled (and, to some extent, unparalleled) choice. But such is the choice our generation must face.

I don't feel that we must choose between some sort of remote, unattainable sainthood or the grave, but, rather, to see that violence will no longer provide the solutions that it once (if ever) did.

There are no nation states to crush here. No Hitler, conveniently at the helm of a state, that we can overwhelm with devastation and thereby staunch some evil. For every so-called terrorist we kill, 10 more arise in their wake. Committing to violence is committing to violence without end, or violence with an end most of us won't be around to see.

For some, like me, non-violence is a spiritual choice. But it need not be. It's a rational, sane choice that we must make, if we analyze the current events with any integrity. It's deeply rooted, I would argue, in empiricism and the real.

Thanks again,

Dennis